UPDATE, April 21: Pearson Media Group removed the tweet mentioned in this post. Props to them for that. I hope they choose what to tweet more carefully in the future.I never thought about
Pearson, an
education publishing corporation, taking a political stand that a high percentage of black people probably find insulting, but I guess it may. Per its Twitter profile, Pearson, which is located in New Jersey, is part of the a media group which includes the Financial Times Group and Penguin.
Today I saw this tweet from the company promoting an article at NewsBusters, a conservative site that supposedly is
fighting "liberal bias" in the media.
White NBC Reporter Confronts Black Man at Tea Party Rally: 'Have You Ever Felt Uncomfortable?' http://bit.ly/dCZ3ay

The tweet takes you to a post that implies, as many right-wing posts do, that the Tea Party has no racist aspects and to say otherwise is to parrot the "liberal media." To suggest or promote in reporting that the shadow of racist appeals does not haunt the Tea Party movement is to be fair, according to many conservatives with blogs as well as traditional media outlets. It's like nobody is allowed to look at America's political history, rhetoric, facts and stats. We're supposed to accept Tea Party members giving lipservice to being nonracist as God's honest truth.
What I find so offensive about posts like the one at Newsbusters that Pearson tweeted is they tell African-Americans to not believe your ears and eyes as though many of us can't read what the Tea Party crowd says in blogs or can't hear its sympathizers in a drugstore or restaurant.
These kinds of pro-conservative posts usually promote an idea straight from the white privilege toolkit that tells people of color, "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. If you think you see racism,
it's in your head.
These articles that seek to separate the Tea Party from a racist legacy by denying that much of its rhetoric smacks of Southern Strategy politics and draws a crowd that falls for that ploy every time imply that black people are being led by a white liberal media or somebody like Al Sharpton and can't think for themselves. And, yes, they suggest that a lone black man wandering around a Tea Party rally somehow is more perceptive about the Tea Party and race matters than all the other black people who say, "We smell a racist rat."
It's the same tactic people use to say
Rush Limbaugh's never said anything racist: "OMG! How can you say Limbaugh's racist? He's got a black person on his staff. OMG!"
These kinds of people think window dressing should be enough to appease us black people, that's how dumb we are to them. When it suits them African-Americans are monolithic, a bunch of welfare mamas, pushers, gangsta members and crackheads with angry college-educated women who can't find husbands and who don't love America enough. Yet, when it suits them, one or two black people will be used to dismiss the opinions of the majority that they've already painted as too angry and dysfunctional to see straight anyway. This is the power of whiteness in America, to set agendas, build propaganda, and tell us we don't have a right to feel what we feel and what we feel is not valid unless it supports white privilege.
So, I'm disappointed by Pearson's tweet. I was unaware that this New Jersey-based company was using funds to push a conservative mindset that suggests there's no racist connection to Tea Party rhetoric. But I'm not surprised. Perhaps Pearson wants to ensure it gets a hefty piece of the pie being served from Texas, which is
rewriting history textbooks so American school children believe conservatives are unfairly maligned, especially on matters of race.
These kinds of NewsBuster reports, and at least one point in a Tea Party myths post at
BlogHer.com, are written in answer to not only posts like Joan Walsh's Salon.com piece, "
The Tea Partiers' racial paranoia," but also the perception of many people of color,
including me, that Tea Party folks, by and large, don't give a damn about black people or understanding race in America.
Grassroots or not, the Tea Party is an extension of Republican Party tentacles and we know
its history on race matters well. What the Tea Party crowd fails to see is that it doesn't exist in a vacuum. We hear its members and sympathizers making the
same kinds of arguments their predecessors made and have been making for more than a century. Many of their political ancestors were proud racists who've produced a generation of people who think it's all about overcoming the perception that they are racists rather than racism itself.
Until Tea Party leadership addresses this part of its legacy head on, the Tea Party movement will make no headway with people like me. But they won't address it because they don't want to offend core members. We know this.
As for Pearson's tweet, I'm changing what had previously been a positive opinion of that company. Its management really should not let its employees post tweets that push any political agenda, liberal, conservative or otherwise, because as long as Pearson's name and logo are on that Twitter page, that's Pearson tweeting not some unseen Republican operative. If an employee wants to push a political agenda, he or she should get a personal blog and leave Pearson's name out of it.
Yes, Pearson under Penguin publishes black authors, but perhaps Pearson has some kind of race issue of its own. I wonder how many black people it has on staff because last year the Penguin side totally
left out its black struggling authors when it launched a site designed to promote underserved book authors. Now that I recall that, I'm less surprised it has people working in another part of the company, Pearson, who would be insensitive enough to push the "none of us are racists and the liberal media's unfair" talking point of the Tea Party crowd.
Undoubtedly, somebody at Pearson and Penguin will think they should be let off the hook for this kind of nonsense because they do good works sometimes like
donating money to literacy programs, but I would say a big "Nah uh!" to that line of thinking.