
Tomorrow night Soul Series presents renowned spoken word poet Taalam Acey. Acey is no stranger to performing in New Orleans. ... Read more at the New Orleans Literature Examiner.
So, one day you look down and see your feet in shoes you don't recognize. Maybe you like them, maybe you don't. This is where life begins. Welcome to WSATA, where the Goddess returns.

Tomorrow night Soul Series presents renowned spoken word poet Taalam Acey. Acey is no stranger to performing in New Orleans. ... Read more at the New Orleans Literature Examiner.

I hate labeling boxes when I organize my house or move. I hate filing. I hate the term "women of color blogs." The latter makes me uncomfortable because it creates a sea of women so vast it sends my writing mind into a seizure. What does that mean, "woman of color blog"?
Does that mean any woman blogging who is not exclusively of European descent? Does it include Jewish women and if it doesn't include Jewish women then should it not include Arab women? After all both groups sprang from the Middle East not Europe. They are both Semites, and both can be classified under the larger umbrella of groups that have been oppressed, not automatically benefiting from "white" privilege.
Does the tag "woman of color" include all Asians? Some Westernized Asians don't identify with oppressed people of color at all, sometimes not even other Asians. Sometimes some Asians, as do certain kinds of upper-crusty black folks, mentally imagine themselves to be white. ... Please continue reading this post at Blogher.com, A Decade of Women of Color in Blogging: Who Was the First WOC Online?
Artwork discovered at Cine's World post. Just giving credit for where I found the art, not sure I know what the hell the person is talking about in the post.
The first is this quote from Laina Dawes of Writing is Fighting. She is also a BlogHer.com contributing editor and a black Canadian who writes about Metal music. Here she's answering my question about what she see or hopes for in the future for women of color BlogHers. The Carmen to which she refers is Carmen Van Kerckhove.In the future...well, I know Carmen from Racialicious personally and I love what she and Latoya Peterson, Wendy Muse and the other contributors are doing - the mix of popular culture and really good critical race theory. Rachel Sullivan, who is a (white) sociologist blogged a bit about her partnership with a black man and her biracial twins, and I loved how she did it. Oh, and the angry black woman(theangryblackwoman.com) has been around for awhile, but her rage has dropped off in the past couple of years. These blogs are smart and funny but very educational. I would love to see more women put that much time into their posts - and I know it is hard and for all the work that you do, you know how hard it is.The other item to share is my podcast with Gina McCauley of What About Our Daughters and Michelle Obama Watch. In the interview, Gina says that she believes blogging benefits the kinds of women of which Laina speaks, those women of color who live outside the box on their own terms:
I want to see more alternative culture blogs - women and other women of colour who are living lives outside of the box. On the other hand, as I can tell you - they are not going to be popular, but at least they make you think. As someone who is an alternative blogger, I think that emphasizing lives outside of what is stereotypically thought of what POC's do is important, especially to the shorties coming up. I want to see more blogs by Latina, South Asian and Native American women. I'm tired of reading the "I can't get a man, men ain't shit, what about my hair? blogs and since I don't have kids, I'm not into mommybloggers.at.all. I want people to stop being PC and let it all hang out. Be real, don't be so nervous about what other people are thinking. (Laina)
While Precious, the movie, based on Sapphire's novel Push, was front and center tonight at the NAACP Image Awards, the organization reminded America that it still stands for justice when it presented Van Jones with the President's Award. Jones is the social activist and environmentalist Fox talk show host Glenn Beck branded a "communist" last year, pressuring Jones to resign in September 2009 from his position as the White House "Green Czar." First of all giving honor to God and also to my mother Loretta Jean Kirkendall Jones--let me get it right. Get that right, straight! I want to thank my beautiful wife and our two boys Matai and Cabral. I want to thank the staff and supporters of Green for All, the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights and Color of Change, incredible freedom fighting organizations. I also want to give a shout out and a salute to President Barack Obama. President Barack Obama who is a world class leader, a man who volunteered to be the captain of the Titanic after it hit the iceberg, and we're still floating, and we're still floating. Let's stay with this president!If you search for Jones under news, you'll see he's making a come back.
And I also want to thank the NAACP for encouraging me to continue in my quest. It took a lot of courage for Ben Jealous to nominate me for this award and to give to me this award. I appreciate that courage, and I appreciate the courage of the NAACP.
I have had 1,000 defeats in this past year, but I had one victory, and it's the most important victory to me: I don't hate anybody. I'm not mad at anybody, and I still believe in the politics of hope. I still believe! You can't take that from me. You can't take it from me.
And I know one thing, we have people in every community in America right now watching this program who don't have jobs, who are suffering, who are afraid, living in economic uncertainty, and I know there's a future out there for them where they get a chance to make the products of tomorrow. If we want the jobs of tomorrow, we have to make the products of tomorrow. There's somebody right now who's in Detroit, and they know how to make cars. They're a skilled machinist, but they're idle. Let them make the wind turbines and the smart batteries and the solar panels to repower this country. Let them work! Give them hope! Give them the opportunity!
There's somebody right now who's living in Appalachia, who's living in rural America, who's afraid she's going to lose her land because she doesn't have enough sources of income. Let her put those wind turbines up. Let her grow an energy crop. Give her the opportunity to hold on to her land and be a part of this energy revolution. Let's get everybody involved in repowering America in a clean way.
And for a country that beautiful, that prosperous, that innovative, that united, I am willing to walk through fire and brimstone and fire and brimstone until we get the job done.
The last thing I want to say is this. To my fellow countryman, Mr. Glenn Beck, I see you and I love you, brother. I love you and you cannot do anything about it. I love you and you cannot do anything about it. Let's be one country! Let's be one country. Let's get the job done. (Transcript of Van Jones's speech accepting 2010 NAACP President's Award at the Image Awards)
Van Jones, who resigned from the White House Council on Environmental Quality last fall in the face of a coordinated smear campaign by conservative activists, has reemerged from his self-imposed exile. He'll be teaching at Princeton University and taking up a senior fellowship at the Center for American Progress, where he will head a "green opportunity initiative." ("After right-wing smears, Van Jones gets a second chance")In a blog post at the NAACP website, its president and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous explains why Jones deserved the President's Award. You may also read The Grio's recent interview with Jones.
While we in New Orleans bask in the glow of Super Bowl victory, Hurricane Katrina ghosts still haunt us. On February 24, yesterday, the story finally broke that Michael Lohman, a former New Orleans Police Department officer, had confessed to conspiring with other officers to cover-up the truth of what happened on the Danziger Bridge September 4, 2005 after the city flooded. On Wednesday, he pleaded guilty in federal court to obstructing justice and promoting lies about the shootings.
While Lohman was not one of the officers on the scene, he was, instead, responsible for supervising the NOPD’s investigation. Lohman did arrive on the scene shortly after the shooting, and according to the bill, he concluded that the shooting was justified. The 21-year veteran of the force abruptly retired earlier this month. (WWL-TV)
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation press release, " Lohman personally drafted a 17-page report, which he knew to be false, and provided that report to an investigator to submit as the official incident report."
Around the nation and here in New Orleans, many concerned citizens never bought the results of the 2007 report that said seven New Orleans police officers had acted righteously in the Danziger incident. The accepted final report relied almost solely on police officer accounts and ignored eye-witness testimony from civilians who were on the bridge that day who said officers shot without provocation at those attempting to cross it, killing two people and wounding four.
Lohman's admission validates stories that officers lied and also planted a gun near the fallen civilians. In the 2005 incident, one of whom was a mentally-handicapped man, Ronald Madison.
“Defendant Lohman, after realizing that officers had shot unarmed civilians, encouraged the involved sergeants to come up with a story justifying the shooting,” said the court document. (WWL)
Read more on this story at NOLA.com/the Times Picayune, including a pdf of the original bill document. This is a continuing investigation as the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice pursue the Danziger 7, the police officers originally charged with the shootings.
In August 2008, Louisiana Criminal District Court Judge Raymond Bigelow threw out local charges against the officers. He "concluded a prosecutor violated grand jury secrecy."
In addition to that information, readers may appreciate this 2007 article, "The Danziger Bridge Killings: How New Orleans Police Gunned Down Civilians Fleeing the Flood" at Democracy Now. Lohman's confession represents a big break in this case.
Maureen Miller reported for Anderson Cooper on this story in 2008, "What Happened on the NOLA Bridge?"
Here’s what we know happened around 9 a.m. on Sunday, September 4th, 2005.
Two men, Ronald Madison, 40 and James Brissette, 19, were killed and four others were wounded as they crossed the Danziger Bridge over the Industrial Canal in eastern New Orleans.
Autopsy results show Madison, a mentally ill man who had no criminal record, was shot in the back several times. No gun was found on him or near him.
Just before shots rang out, police received a Signal 108 – the code for an officer or officers in danger and in need of assistance. Seven officers heard the call at their makeshift office in a banquet hall they’d taken over after Katrina flooded their usual work space.
According to their statements in a police report, they thought two of their fellow officers were “down” – either wounded or killed – near the bridge.
The seven officers rushed to the scene. When they arrived they say at least four people were shooting at them. They say they only started shooting after they were fired upon.
But survivors of the shooting who were on the bridge say they were unarmed and ambushed by the seven officers. The survivors say they were simply walking across the bridge to a grocery store to get food. (CNN)
And here is a link to the NPR story of 2006, "What Happened?"
The story was also reported as it broke on local Fox 8.
The bill of information goes on to allege that police planned to provide false and misleading information on the shootings and would cover up other information in order to ensure the shootings would appear legally justified. Lohman allegedly went along with the plan and the "clean" gun was later used in the investigation, according to prosecutors.
Prosecutors say an investigator knowingly failed to take steps that would have allowed a proper investigation, including telling Lohman he planned to plant a gun and other evidence under the bridge to justify the shooting.
The current NOLA.com headline says Lohman's plea deal blows this case "wide open."
This story and other Hurricane Katrina stories of African-Americans being gunned down following the storm, fester as an open wound in the city's race relations. The families of the victims in this particular case pursued further investigation relentlessly, always maintaining that their dead or wounded loved ones were not the criminals the officers reported them to be. The case has been a symbol of how some in law enforcement and some in the media misrepresented certain events following Katrina, making it appear that New Orleans was a city of roving black looters, rapists, and snipers, and that perception made it easier for the police to tell whatever stories they chose about shootings.
I am one of the people who never believed the police officers' version. The victims were African-American, and the NOPD is not known for being trustworthy, a fact long-time New Orleans residents know. If black they may be doubly aware and instinctively question the police version of events when a case sags with media attention. For those who want to understand why that is, the problems of NOPD brutality in New Orleans have been documented in a book, Black Rage in New Orleans: Police Brutality and African American Activism from World War II to Hurricane Katrina, which will be released by LSU Press in April.
Having lived long enough to know that our racial problems would not disappear with our recent good news and anticipating that eventually our Super Bowl euphoria expanding good will to all will fade, I wrote a poem in early February called "Gaining Yardage." It hopes that New Orleanians won't let life's racial tensions and this kind of information keep our different ethnic groups from working toward what's best for the city in the future.
News of injustice fires anger and ferments bitterness, but bitterness rarely results in justice. I keep hoping we will learn from the past not to repeat its uglier stories, and so I look at this breaking news as a sign that gone are the days of sweeping this kind of ugliness under a rug. If we want a clean house, if we want to keep marching toward progress, we must be willing to sanitize every corner, and yet, being the practical woman that I am, I know dirt always comes back and stubborn stains suck the most.
This piece is also syndicated at BlogHer.com
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Dick Cheney also appeared, but without his gun, gloating and saying he thinks Obama is a one-term president.
With little risk of being wrong, I'll say, "Most women have an issue with their mothers." They may not have a big Oprah-show-worthy issue with Mom, maybe not even a priest or therapist-worthy issue, possibly not even a sleepless night irritation, but somewhere deep in her soul, a woman has some kind of matter about mother that pricks her with questions: What does my mother's womanhood teach me or not teach me, and what does my mother's womanhood say about my womanhood?
Paraphrasing what I said to novelist and blogger Carleen Brice in a Blog Talk Radio interview yesterday, I think that even if our mother is ideal in our eyes, we may still have a problem, the fear we'll never be as perfect as we believe her to be or she seems to believe herself to be.
Brice's first novel, Orange Mint and Honey (One World/Ballantine, 2008, paperback, 324 pp.) is about a mother-daughter relationship, one with a painful history and uncertain future. It's a story of a woman in her twenties growing up after she thought she was grown as she learns to forgive so she can move forward. It's a compelling tale that's gone from book to film. It is now the movie Sins of the Mother, starring singer and actress Jill Scott, and it premieres Sunday night, Feb. 21, at 8:00 p.m. ET and 5:00 p.m. PT on the Lifetime Movie Network. ... Please read more at BlogHer.com
I'm working on a blog post for BlogHer.com about female friendships. It's kind of a hard write for me because my mind is very noisy on the topic and because I don't tend to keep lots of friends. My personal experience on the subject matter is rather limited because I don't think that I've ever had a BFF (Best Friend Forever), not even as a younger woman. I've been seeing the previews for From Paris, With Love, starring John Travolta, and for only one reason have I considered going to see this movie: Travolta, who will be 56 on February 18, is looking mighty tasty. Yes, I know, that's so subjective, but as a woman who recently turned 50, I keep an eye out for how the males in my age-range are holding up.

Folks scrutinize women and judge how they're aging, right? Well, I refuse to be sexist. I think the men need a gander too.
Back in 2008, People Magazine ran a poll that asked whether John Travolta looked better bald or with the black, luxurious locks of his youth. That poll's closed now, of course, but either way, Travolta looks hot to me. However, I favor the bald Travolta these days.

Oh, let's see. I'm not in the best of moods. When I opened my email this morning I had a Google alert on African-American authors and the only story in it was a posting of a faux story at Black Voices about Sophia Stewart winning her case against the Wachowski brothers and whoever else it was she sued regarding The Matrix Trilogy and Terminator.
New Orleans is a land of color--colorful traditions like Mardi Gras, colorful stories like the one that will be told about the Saints winning Super Bowl 44, and colorful characters like legendary gangster Frenchy Brouillette. ... Please read more at the New Orleans Literature Examiner.
Yesterday, I had to say something on John Mayer, and I did so in the post "John Mayer Reveals His Authentically Racist Self." After seeing how people--in one case even one of the black women he named--extended their hands to say "I don't think John Mayer is racist," I began to ponder what that meant. RE John Mayer > Oddly, people debate whether he is racist but agree with little debate that he is sexist as though to identify Mayer as "racist" is as bad as him using the "N" word or labeling his penis David Duke. On sexism we say if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it's a duck. But if it walks like a racist duck, then we debate hearts and intent. Do Americans understand what the word "racist" actually means? (Posted at TwitLonger)I've gotten a definite impression, as I implied in comments on another post, that many Americans in today's popular culture think the word "racist" means a person who comes to your house and burns a cross on your lawn or lynches your husband, and rapes your daughter for fun. We associate the word racist with these extreme acts of terror, but the word "racist" in its purist sense means simply a person who thinks his/her race is superior to other races in the same way the word "sexist" means to think that one's gender is superior.
The word "racist," because of hate groups, has come to mean more the equivalent of the word bigot as in it's associated with extreme hate and intolerance. People think racist is to race as wife-beating misogynist is to woman or Nazi is to Jew. That, however, is incorrect. Racist is to race as sexist is to woman, which is why "hatred or intolerance of another race or other races" is number three on the definition of "racist" not number one.
We've done an exceptional job of making people feel guilty and afraid to be called racist, to get all wound up in a knot if the word is uttered against them, and by extension to fear examining whether what they do or think is racist the same way the devoutly religious are afraid sometimes to acknowledge they've felt lust or anger. Instilling that fear was probably necessary to make some of the strides in Civil Rights that we've made, but now it's time to grow up and understand what the word "racist" means. Only then will we have any chance of stepping into the mythic land of Post-Racial America. (Nordette in comments at BlogHer)
In addition to fear of calling a white person "racist," I'm hearing from some of us that black people need to stop having knee jerk responses to the word "nigger." I agree. We should be intelligent enough to examine context. Who knows, if Mayer had stopped at "nigger" pass, given the point he was trying to make, I would have chalked what he said up to imprudent use of irony. But he didn't. He added to the fire that his penis was white supremacist.
But many times we must look at context before we throw a hissy fit. For instance, if we encourage a banning the word "nigger" mentality no matter what the context, then what will we do with this poem by Harlem Renaissance writer Countee Cullen, "Incident"? How will we learn to evaluate the works of Zora Neale Hurston? Should we toss out Mark Twain? Can we grasp the point in Taalam Acey's "Market for Ni$$as"?
That said, what is going on in the American psyche that it now takes affront at use of the word "racist"? I see people redefining common sense methods of identifying a person as "racist" as "resorting to name calling." So, I say, "While it's true we need to stop having a knee-jerk response to the word "nigger" and consider political or literary context, it's critical that we do not start having knee jerk responses to use of the word 'racist.'"
I am disappointed at the fallacy that the word racist must be reserved for only the ugliest of white supremacists. That notion is absolute nonsense. We are speakers of English. Let us use more than one part of speech.
Intelligent people understand that there are different levels of racism, even different types--paternal racism, blatant racism, conscious racism, subconscious or repressed racism. So, add adjectives when you use the word "racist" if you want to establish to what degree a person is racist.
Define your racist! Here are a dozen types of racist just off the top of my head.
Should we slaughter John Mayer now? I mean that figuratively. I know to clarify that I meant that figuratively because I know there are white people, like the ones who were outraged at Serena Williams's tantrum, who believe if a black person speaks of violence she means she will literally kill someone. (The) John Mayer thing only bugs black ppl who confuse trying 2sing blck w/liking blck ppl. Cultural theft has nothing to do w/love. (Nordette)The rest of what I could say would be book length and discuss the dangers of looking in any poet's, songwriter's, or novelist's closet. What they really think about life and your people might not sit well with you, especially on race.
Today, my son, 19, returned home from classes at the University of New Orleans, bounded into my bedroom where I was working and said, "So, tomorrow, you'll be over the hill."
I said, "What do you mean? I'm already over the hill." And I laughed.
He said, "Mom, haven't you heard that 50 is the new 40? Everybody knows that the half-way point makes you over the hill."
I grinned, contemplating that ... Read more at BlogHer.com.
| New Orleans Saints Video: Victory Parade |
.
Whether by coincidence or providence, I do not know, but tonight, after seeing a post at BlogHer.com on the complexities of interracial dating, I came across the 1949 20th Century Fox movie Pinky on cable via demand. The movie is based on a book by Cid Ricketts Sumner, a white female writer from Mississippi.Now that our screen has contemplated some bitter evidence of anti-Negro bias as it has crashed with dramatic explosion upon individuals in the Army and in "the North" ("Home of the Brave" and "Lost Boundaries"), it has remained for Darryl F. Zanuck and Twentieth Century-Fox to shift the scope of observation into that more noted arena of racism, the Deep South. And in "Pinky," their film upon this subject, which opened at the Rivoli yesterday, they have come forth with a picture that is vivid, revealing and emotionally intense.Turner Classic Movies is currently showing the film for Black History Month, it seems. According to Wikipedia, this movie was banned in Marshall, Texas, when it was released. One writer said the producers "missed a golden opportunity" by failing to cast Lena Horne as the main character.
Telling a story of a young nurse —a girl with white skin but Negro blood—who returns to her home in Mississippi after being raised and schooled in the North, this picture assembles illustrations of the cruel humiliations and abuse to which this girl is subjected after her identity is found out. It also presents a tender aspect of the mutual loyalties between Negro servants and white masters that still exist in the South, and it skirts the edge of a fragile romance between the girl and a young white doctor from the North. (New York Times, 1949, read full review)
Watch Jim Henderson's final commentary is an homage to the Saints fans and the City of New Orleans and the team that has helped us believe.Related: New Orleans Sees Bright Economic Future with Super Bowl.

When news came that Mitch Landrieu had won the New Orleans mayor's race, I was reclining on my sofa with a headache, watching a horrible made-for-TV SyFy Channel movie. (Maybe that was making my headache worse.) And I was thinking about how I'd be watching the Super Bowl Sunday even though I'm not into football. Come on, it's great news for the city.When he takes office May 6, Landrieu will become the city's first white chief executive since his father, Moon Landrieu, left the job in 1978. Early analysis shows that Mitch Landrieu's victory owed to widespread crossover voting by African-Americans, who make up two-thirds of the city's residents. (NOLA.com)New Orleanians with deep city roots, regardless of race and prior to Landrieu coming in, looked at the field of mayoral candidates and were scared witless. None of the candidates had the political clout or experience needed to lead this city into a new era of recovery. The ones who seemed capable were too unknown and the ones who were known seemed too incapable.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
OLBERMANN: Sarah Palin will stand up to anyone to defend her baby, except anyone who might help her politically. After calling for White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel to be fired for using a phrase, behind closed doors, which she calls heartbreaking to special needs kids and their families, she is refusing to call for the same measures against Republicans who use that word or variations on it, even on national radio or TV.Even I didn't think Palin was that stupid and that big of a hypocrite to demand Emanuel be fired for using the "R" word while her cohorts did the same. A definitely lapse of healthy cynicism about politicians on my part there because had I looked I would have found this recording at Media Matters, posted January 9, 2009, more than a year ago, of Glenn Beck "laughing, to Mary Lynn Rajskub: "What do the paintings of the retarded children go for?"
This weekend, she will be campaigning for a man whose top campaign aide has used that word repeatedly directly to journalists. But first, tonight‘s new developments; after the Plum Line Blog called Palin‘s attention to the fact that Orly Taitz Limbaugh too used the word, glorified in it, while referring to the Emanuel story, Palin‘s spokeswoman issued a statement that did not call for Limbaugh to be fired or even apologize. And if you read it carefully, does not in fact criticize Limbaugh at all. Quote, “Governor Palin believes crude and demeaning name calling at the expense of others is disrespectful.”
And yet never has the integrity to stand up for her son and say that Limbaugh, just like Emanuel, actually did this. Republican number two who can say the word, Texas campaign consultant Dave Carney, whose repeated use of this word, even directly to reporters, called into question yesterday, has not led Palin to call for his resignation from the campaign of Texas Governor Rick Perry, for whom Palin, herself, will be campaigning this weekend.
And Republican number three who can use the word, not once like Emanuel, not privately like Emanuel, but repeatedly on national television, on national radio, laughing about it and it‘s perfectly fine with Sarah Palin—that would be Fox News host Glenn Beck, whose uses of the word were literally too numerous for us to present in their entirety in our time allotted tonight, but to whom Ms. Palin gave a lengthy interview just last month, after a year of Beckian commentary that included the following. (Olbermann's transcript)